PRJ-04Active · 2019 — ongoing
Neotropical felid connectivity
Camera trapping and environmental DNA sampling across fragmented forest blocks to measure gene flow between jaguar subpopulations.
Programmes
Research projects in the field and the laboratory.
Each programme runs over multiple seasons and produces numbered research reports as results are confirmed.
Demo dataAll records, samples, and reports shown here are sample content for demonstration only — not real identification results or official certification.
PRJ-09Active · 2021 — ongoing
Canid pelage and diet reconstruction
Guard-hair microscopy combined with stable isotope analysis to reconstruct seasonal foraging ranges in temperate canids.
PRJ-11Active · 2022 — ongoing
Raptor migration density survey
Standardised counting stations along two flyways, recording passage density and its relation to local weather systems.
PRJ-02Completed · 2017 — 2024
Reference collection digitisation
Photographic and metadata capture of the historical specimen collection, producing the indexed record set behind report verification.
Research approach
Evidence retained with every study.
Programmes combine repeatable field protocols, comparative reference material, and documented analytical methods. Reports state both the evidence examined and the limits of the interpretation.
Identification
Identification Services
Structured scientific examination for animal specimens, biological materials, photographs, and associated research evidence.
View identification services →Samples
Specimen Collection
Catalogued specimen records with photographs, SPM numbers, and links to their research reports.
Browse specimen records →Research governance
Animal Research Ethics
“All animal experiments in this study were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of [Name of University/Institution] (Approval Protocol No. ARC-2026-1024). All procedures were performed in strict accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).”
The approving institution is shown as a placeholder. It must be replaced with the actual approving institution before this statement is presented as a completed ethics approval, and the protocol number is shown as provided pending confirmation against the corresponding approval record.